Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ESMO Open ; 8(1): 100782, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791638

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended testing patients for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency before systemic treatment with fluoropyrimidines (FP). DPD activity testing identifies patients at elevated risk of severe FP-related toxicity (FP-TOX). The two most used methods for DPD testing are DPYD genotyping and DPD phenotyping (plasma uracil concentration). The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall frequency of overall grade ≥3 FP-TOX before and after the implementation of DPYD genotyping. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty Danish, primarily gastrointestinal cancer patients, were DPYD-genotyped before their first dose of FP, and blood was sampled for post hoc assessment of P-uracil. The initial dose was reduced for variant carriers. Grade ≥3 FP-TOX was registered after the first three treatment cycles of FP. The frequency of toxicity was compared to a historical cohort of 492 patients with post hoc determined DPYD genotype from a biobank. RESULTS: The frequency of overall grade ≥3 FP-TOX was 27% in the DPYD genotype-guided group compared to 24% in the historical cohort. In DPYD variant carriers, DPYD genotyping reduced the frequency of FP-related hospitalization from 19% to 0%. In the control group, 4.8% of DPYD variant carriers died due to FP-TOX compared to 0% in the group receiving DPYD genotype-guided dosing of FP. In the intervention group, wild-type patients with uracil ≥16 ng/ml had a higher frequency of FP-TOX than wild-type patients with uracil <16 ng/ml (55% versus 28%). CONCLUSIONS: We found no population-level benefit of DPYD genotyping when comparing the risk of grade ≥3 FP-TOX before and after clinical implementation. We observed no deaths or FP-related hospitalizations in patients whose FP treatment was guided by a variant DPYD genotype. The use of DPD phenotyping may add valuable information in DPYD wild-type patients.


Assuntos
Deficiência da Di-Hidropirimidina Desidrogenase , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Humanos , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Dinamarca , Deficiência da Di-Hidropirimidina Desidrogenase/induzido quimicamente , Deficiência da Di-Hidropirimidina Desidrogenase/tratamento farmacológico , Deficiência da Di-Hidropirimidina Desidrogenase/genética , Di-Hidrouracila Desidrogenase (NADP)/genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Genótipo , Uracila/uso terapêutico
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(8): 3763-3769, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828491

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel. Though no pharmacological agents have been identified to prevent CIPN, cryotherapy with frozen gloves and socks may reduce the risk of developing CIPN and thereby increase the likelihood of patients completing the planned dose of paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among women with early-stage breast cancer who received at least one cycle of paclitaxel, 119 were included in the 2016 cohort who received cryotherapy when they developed symptoms of CIPN, and 96 patients in the 2017 cohort who received prophylactic cryotherapy. From electronic patient records, data were abstracted on dates and doses of adjuvant paclitaxel, dose reductions, cycle delays, symptoms of CIPN, and whether and when frozen gloves and socks were used. The outcome was the proportion of patients completing the planned 720 mg/m2 of paclitaxel cumulated over nine cycles. The hazard ratio (HR) of a dose-limiting event due to CIPN was estimated in a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In the 2016 cohort, cryotherapy was needed due to symptoms of CIPN in 54 (45%) patients. Significantly, more patients, 77% in the 2017 cohort, completed the planned dose of 720 mg/m² compared with 64% in the 2016 cohort, p = 0.017. The HR of a dose reduction or cessation due to CIPN, adjusted for age and HER-2 status, was 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.30-0.84), p = 0.009, for the 2017 cohort compared with the 2016 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that prophylactic cryotherapy may reduce the risk of a dose-limiting event due to CIPN and increase the proportion of patients completing the planned dose of paclitaxel in adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Despite this, CIPN remains to be an important dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Crioterapia/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/farmacologia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...